This paper is based on several Action-Research (AR) projects managed in a rural area of Salento (Lecce-Italy) related to environmental issue. Starting from AR experiences shaped after several case studies, we can affirm that participative evaluation/planning in environmental issues have enabled both collaborative/cooperative learning processes and improved community empowerment promoting solutions to achieve a shared vision on an environmental issue negotiating with local authorities and the client company. Community education as a goal of ecojustice think, considers citizens as co-responsible protagonists in deciding on environmental and territorial changes. AR has involved the social actors in sharing knowledge/decisions/actions aimed to define together a set of indicators both for monitoring the social investment and for evaluating the social risk related to the likely opening of a biomass energy station in that area of Salento. AR in a systemic and no-dialectic perspective permits a mediation between both top-down decision-making processes and the risk of bottom-up protests thanks to the improvement of initiatives of participative democracy. This process of social/institutional capability is aimed both to inform multilevel policies related to environmental issue and to carry on initiatives of governance of common goods.

Community and institutional capability: sharing a social contract on environmental issue in the South of Italy

Patera S;
2013-01-01

Abstract

This paper is based on several Action-Research (AR) projects managed in a rural area of Salento (Lecce-Italy) related to environmental issue. Starting from AR experiences shaped after several case studies, we can affirm that participative evaluation/planning in environmental issues have enabled both collaborative/cooperative learning processes and improved community empowerment promoting solutions to achieve a shared vision on an environmental issue negotiating with local authorities and the client company. Community education as a goal of ecojustice think, considers citizens as co-responsible protagonists in deciding on environmental and territorial changes. AR has involved the social actors in sharing knowledge/decisions/actions aimed to define together a set of indicators both for monitoring the social investment and for evaluating the social risk related to the likely opening of a biomass energy station in that area of Salento. AR in a systemic and no-dialectic perspective permits a mediation between both top-down decision-making processes and the risk of bottom-up protests thanks to the improvement of initiatives of participative democracy. This process of social/institutional capability is aimed both to inform multilevel policies related to environmental issue and to carry on initiatives of governance of common goods.
2013
Participatory action research
community engagement
valutazione
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14090/1405
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
social impact